ALL MOZART
Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 8:00 p.m.
Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
Peace Concert Hall
Edvard Tchivzhel, conductor
Caroline Ulrich, flute
W.A. Mozart |
Overture to Abduction from Seraglio, K. 384 |
Concerto for Flute in G, K313 | |
Symphony No. 39, K. 543 |
Sponsored by Ann & Michael Chengrian

This General Operating Support Grant program is funded in part
by the Metropolitan Arts Council with grants received from the City of Greenville, the South Carolina Arts Commission whichreceives support from the National Endowment for the Arts and private donations.

This organization is funded in part by the
South Carolina Arts Commissionwhich receives support
from the National Endowment for the Arts.
MOZART
Program Notes by Paul Hyde
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791)
“The Abduction from the Seraglio” Overture
Mozart composed a rambunctious little overture for his 1782 opera “The Abduction from the Seraglio.” With the addition of instruments associated with Turkish music – cymbal, drum and triangle – Mozart thought it a clangorous affair as well.
He wrote to his father from Vienna: “It modulates on and on, from key to key so that I don’t believe anyone could fall asleep, even if he hadn’t slept at all the whole night before.”
The overture and the entire opera are products of some of Mozart’s happiest years. He was 26 years old, had just left the service of the arrogant Archbishop of Salzburg and moved to Vienna. There, the premiere of “The Abduction from the Seraglio” had proven a big hit. At the time, the young composer also was deeply in love with the woman who would become his wife.
The opera itself centers on a Spanish nobleman’s attempt to rescue his fiancée from Turkish captivity — thus, the aforementioned Turkish instruments, which held a special appeal for the public in the Vienna of Mozart’s time. The overture itself seems to speak of tiptoes down the hall and hairbreadth escapes.
The overture is built upon the spirited theme heard at the beginning. That main subject alternates with more lyrical themes from the opera.
Mozart
Flute Concerto No. 1 in G
Mozart professed not to like the flute as a solo instrument, but he wrote some beautiful concertos for it.
The 21-year-old composer composed this charming Flute Concerto in 1778 on commission for the Dutch flutist Ferdinand De Jean. As an amateur, De Jean expected something easy. Instead, he got this piece, which despite its lyrical fluidity, makes considerable demands on the soloist.
The concerto is written in the traditional three movements:
- Allegro maestoso. The orchestra announces the main themes of the first movement, beginning with the most prominent of them all – a melody that manages to be both majestic and tripping. When the flute takes on this principal theme, it weaves a garland of variations. Flute soloist and strings engage in a lively, extended dialogue. A reprise of the basic themes leads to a cadenza, which Mozart left free for the soloist to display her art.
- Adagio ma non troppo. The songful slow movement is a gem. A solo oboe in the orchestra intones the gentle first theme, which is soon taken up by the solo flute against muted strings, creating a nocturnal mood. Mozart provides contrast with a yearning, upward-reaching second melody. Mozart adds another cadenza for the soloist before launching into the finale.
- Rondo: Tempo di Menuetto. The flute soloist introduces the spirited dominant theme of the movement. Characteristic of a rondo, this main theme returns several times, alternating with other material. The solo flute’s leaps and running passages seem designed to test a virtuoso’s technique. Following a flurry of challenging episodes for the soloist, the concerto concludes, surprisingly, on a note of quiet grace.
Mozart
Symphony No. 39
Mozart’s last three symphonies, Nos. 39-41, are considered his greatest but were written in a time of financial distress for the composer. In the summer of 1788, Mozart wrote a series of humiliating letters to a fellow Freemason, the well-to-do merchant Michael Puchberg, begging for one loan after another. The kindly Puchberg often obliged.
Yet the Symphony No. 39 gives little hint of Mozart’s desperation. It’s a sunny work, imbued with the spirt of Italian comic opera. Mozart transformed his despair into works of great beauty and joy.
It’s cast in the traditional four movements.
- Adagio—Allegro. The long, slow introduction is majestic and dignified but tinged with an air of mystery and anxiety. The following allegro, dominated by two flowing themes, establishes a mood of warmth and good cheer that abides for the rest of the movement.
- Andante. The slow movement toggles between pastoral innocence and gentle melancholy. In the middle section, the music becomes momentarily more passionate, but the reflective mood soon returns. Mozart’s rich array of themes is derived, for the most part, from the opening four-measure theme.
- Menuetto: Allegretto. The third-movement minuet is both stately and robust. The middle section features a songful dialogue between solo clarinet and flute.
- The finale is a marvel of energy, with a momentum that rarely flags, even in its quiet moments. The entire movement, full of wit and high spirits, is built upon the breezy initial tune. The finale races to an exuberant conclusion.
Paul Hyde is the Public Information Director for the College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities at Clemson University. A graduate of Clemson with a bachelor’s degree in English, he has done post-graduate work at Harvard University. Paul writes frequently for the Greenville Journal and other publications. Follow Paul on Facebook and Twitter: @PaulHyde7.
At age 5, Tchivzhel was enrolled at a prestigious, highly competitive music school in St. Petersburg, where he majored in piano for 11 years until continuing those studies at the Leningrad Conservatoire. “My father wanted me to conduct eventually,” he says. “Before World War II, my father started conducting, but then the war broke.”
A child born in Soviet Russia at the onset of the Cold War, of course he was technically forbidden from outside-the-wall media such as “Voice of America” — which along with the sounds of Duke Ellington, Ella Fitzgerald, and the “absolutely fantastic” Louis Armstrong, brought news and highlights of the world. His father would come home from performing at the theatre, and the two who “didn’t sleep as well” would listen to the radio together.
The Russian-language broadcast began at 11 pm and would last until 2 am. “We would start on one frequency, and in five minutes, Russia would overwhelm it – liberty, freedom or anything outside of the wall.” So they would jump frequencies ahead of Russian policing, often to no avail; but “Sometimes you could hear it all night!
“Everyone was curious of course — despite fears of your apartment neighbors, who could report on you. So it was kind of a very dangerous game, but many people wanted to get away from this Russian brainwashing with the Soviet Union. ‘Voice of America’ was very helpful. That was a major source of information.”
Though jazz is still a most beloved genre for Maestro Tchivzhel, he considers symphonic music “the highest form of music-making” – partly because it embraces nearly all instruments, and involves up to hundreds of musicians playing together. But he was fascinated by the unrestrained, liberated openness of jazz improvisation.
For classical legends such as Handel and Bach, improvisation used to be a part of the composition process; but according to Tchivzhel, these days “very few classical musicians can still do it. But jazz players, they improvise. They are very interesting! Some of them don’t know how to read notes. It’s simply by ear. Their skill is amazing. They might write it later, after they improvise it from their mind and soul. It is very special.”
For the Maestro, the magic of creating music in its most sublime form is not reliant on education, training or technique. There are “a thousand composers” who might be prolific or have impeccable resumes, but they aren’t Tchaikovsky or Bach. “That type of music – they receive it. They get it and they let us know about it. It’s supposed to come to you. You cannot wing it. Of course everybody can learn how to do something if you are, more or less, musically inclined. Technique alone is not enough.” Instead, the value of music is found in pure emotional expression — “a combination of colors and power.”
Neither does the Maestro believe that technique alone is sufficient for a great orchestral conductor. As the leader of a large group of people, it’s much more about understanding and influencing them – one has to understand the nature of the instruments, but also the orchestra playing them. He even refers to the various sounds of the instruments as “voices.”
“You have to hear all the musicians themselves. They are all people, human beings. So when you are working with them, it’s not like plucking strings. It’s feelings, emotional influence on other people. You have to give them that. Everyone can show someone how to play, but it doesn’t mean you can conduct. You have to make sure you do not destroy the orchestra.”
In addition to piano, Maestro Tchivzhel gained experience throughout the years in playing orchestral cello and the French horn. At age 18 and in his first year in the Leningrad Conservatoire, he was to be drafted into service like everyone else. But a couple years in advance, he received “smart advice” to start the French horn. He could earn an invitation into the Meter Band of St. Petersburg, which usually played on special occasions for the government, in parades, and at “funerals of generals and big guys.”
So that is what he did.
“I was lucky. There is no such occasion for a piano player in the band, because it’s only woodwinds, brass and percussion. They said that if I played some brass instrument they would take me, and in free time I could play piano concerto. I just blew my French horn from 10 until 2 in the afternoon, and then they let me go. I continued to study in the conservatory, which was very important, and also, I had nice practice.”
Though he had mastered several instruments, in order to conduct he completed three more years of postgraduate study at the Conservatoire’s Higher Academy of Music in the prestigious conducting classes of Arvid Jansons. The transition to conducting was not easy, he says, because conductors don’t touch the instruments themselves. Besides working with people, much of the job is interpretation, and bringing that to life with many others.
Says principal oboist Virginia Metzger, who has played with the Maestro since he joined the GSO in 1999 (prior to his official move to Greenville, he served as Music Director for the Fort Wayne [Indiana] Philharmonic from 1993-2008): “During the season, you’re more or less bringing to life a conductor’s vision. You’re in an orchestra with 80 people, and its basically creating energy, and the way that energy flows out and reaches other people. You’re just part of this big event.”
Maestro Tchivzhel says, “You have to know details, and to know how to build some sort of vision — what you want to say as a symphony. The main goal is to deliver what the composer wanted to do. Conductors are supposed to be able to extract sound he likes.
“You have to feel the majority of players. As a teacher, you are supposed to know more than the musicians. They know what to do, but the conductor is supposed to bring something new. You have to inspire them to do something that otherwise, they don’t do, and you have to know and feel what that is.
“Musicians practice weeks in advance for a first rehearsal, but for conductors, it takes months or even years to study orchestral scores. They are supposed to study to build imagination and final results. In other words, it is thousands of details. Many details you have to decide yourself. You are not just conducting empty air. It takes time to figure out what to do at the podium to get results.”
Maestro Tchivzhel is well known for the passion and charisma he brings to the podium; his energy level is no less than astounding.
“You can say this for the musicians and the audience – he has this charisma, and I don’t know any audience member who does not love him and fallen under his spell. He expects to get the best from the staff and the musicians, and he will give the best. You don’t give 99% — you give 100%, and he will do the same,” says GSO Marketing Director Todd Weir.
As far as the Maestro’s impeccable attention to the “thousands” of details he must conduct, principal timpanist Daniel Kirkpatrick says, “Edvard is sharp as a tack. I love that about him. He has the mind of a steel trap. If you make a mistake, he will tell you about it in two days. I think he is what makes all this work. People like his story. They like his style. The guy listens. A good conductor can make a symphony great. He is the reason this symphony is where it is right now.”
The Maestro believes that in all rehearsals, a conductor serves as “a teacher and a psychologist“ due to the many personalities he must address: “You have to bring the best of players, but you have to make sure you don’t scare them or make them nervous.”
Says co-principal trumpet Phil Elkins: “He’s definitely got a charisma. Not only to the public but to the players themselves. He can be very intimidating on the podium. He knows exactly what he wants. He is receptive to people’s suggestions, too, at the same time. They have to be presented in the way and at the right time. He has probably taken the orchestra up a couple different levels. There’s a dynamic, a musicality, an enthusiasm that is just not found, especially in regional orchestra.”
Maestro Tchivzhel has conducted all over the world; aside from Russia and several orchestras he has conducted in the U.S., he has appeared in Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, Finland, England, Romania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, China, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Venezuela and more.
But Greenville – his first stop on that fateful 1991 tour with the U.S.S.R. State Symphony Orchestra (which also happened to be the first performance in the Peace Center) – is now his beloved home. And after defecting, he along with his son Arvid and his wife Luba became U.S. citizens in 1999.
“We have a very nice atmosphere here. It’s friendly. Really it’s a team that tries to achieve the best results, and they are talented, they are ready to give their best. They have no easy life, I can tell you. We – our listeners and myself – expect perfect playing without any excuses. It’s a very enthusiastic atmosphere. Most importantly, we have people who like to make music. Sometimes in big orchestra, people are playing, but they are not having fun.”
Learn more about Maestro Edvard Tchivzhel here.
Flutist Caroline Ulrich enjoys an extensive orchestral performing career in North and South Carolina. She has been Principal Flute of the Greenville Symphony Orchestra for more than two decades and Maestro Edvard Tchivzel has selected her to perform concertos with the orchestra on numerous occasions. Some of the highlights have been Lukas Foss’s Renaissance Concerto, Ibert’s Concerto, and Mozart’s Concerto for Flute and Harp. Caroline also performs with the Spartanburg Philharmonic, South Carolina Philharmonic, Asheville Symphony Orchestra, and Rock Hill Philharmonic. Previous appointments include the Springfield Symphony (IL), Waterloo Cedar Falls Symphony, and Augusta (GA) Opera. Additionally, she has performed with many Broadway Touring Shows including Wicked, Phantom of the Opera, Porgy and Bess, The King and I, My Fair Lady, Camelot, The Sound of Music, Peter Pan, and one of her favorites, Ragtime.
Along with Carla Copeland Burns, Erinn Frechette, and Amy Orsinger Whitehouse, Caroline Ulrich is a founding member of FLUTE4. This outstanding ensemble performs throughout the southeast and champions newly composed music for flute quartet, while featuring a wide range of sounds available to the piccolo, C-flute, alto flute, and bass flute.
Dr. Ulrich is on the faculty at Furman University and the South Carolina Governor’s School for the Arts and Humanities where she teaches private flute lessons and coaches chamber ensembles.
VIOLIN
Xiaoli Saliny,
Concertmaster
Leila Cunningham Roe Endowed Chair
Sarah Land Assistant,
Concertmaster
Uwe Diestel Endowed Chair
Inez Hullinger Redman
David Strassberg
Carol Roosevelt
James R. Johnston
Essena Setaro
VIOLIN
Joanna Mulfinger,
Principal
Catherine Hazan,
Assistant Principal
Teresa M. Curran
Emily Kirkpatrick
Felix Farrar
David Edwards
Elizabeth Fee
VIOLA
John Young Shik Concklin,
Principal
Erika and Chuck Riddiford Endowed Chair
Scott Garrett,
Assistant Principal
Kara Poorbaugh
Michael Holub
CELLO
Ismail Akbar,
Principal
Guild of the Greenville Symphony Endowed Chair
Ryan Knott,
Assistant Principal
David Saliny
Cynthia Sulko
DOUBLE BASS
Tim Easter,
Principal
Anonymous Endowed Chair
Todd L. Beal,
Assistant Principal
Jonathan McWilliams
FLUTE
Lauren Vaughn,
Principal
Alice and Jerry Lenz Endowed Chair
Esther Waite
OBOE
Virginia Zeblisky Metzger,
Principal
Guild of the Greenville Symphony Endowed Chair
Kelly Mozeik
CLARINET
Anthony Marotta,
Principal
Harriet and Jerry Dempsey Endowed Chair
Kyra Krenitsky Zhang
BASSOON
Lauren Piccirillo Waid,
Principal
Anonymous Endowed Chair
Stephanie Lipka
HORN
Anneka Zuehlke-King,
Principal
Charles W. Wofford and Nancy B. Thomas Endowed Chair
Elizabeth Regas
TRUMPET
Phillip Elkins,
Co-Principal
Beverley and Jim Whitten Endowed Chair
Kevin Lyons,
Co-Principal
TIMPANI
Daniel Kirkpatrick,
Principal
Nancy B. Stanton Endowed Chair
PERCUSSION
Edward C. Nagel,
Principal
Gary Robinson
Rick Blackwell
PRODUCTION MANAGER
Laura Auvil
PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN
John Wickey